This site uses cookies to measure how you use the website so it can be updated and improved based on your needs and also uses cookies to help remember the notifications you’ve seen, like this one, so that we don’t show them to you again. If you could also tell us a little bit about yourself, this information will help us understand how we can support you better and make this site even easier for you to use and navigate.

Effect of citalopram on agitation in Alzheimer disease: the CitAD randomized clinical trial

Authors

Porsteinsson, Anton P., Drye, Lea T., Pollock, Bruce G., Devanand, D. P., Frangakis, Constantine, Ismail, Zahinoor, Marano, Christopher, Meinert, Curtis L., Mintzer, Jacobo E., Munro, Cynthia A., Pelton, Gregory, Rabins, Peter V., Rosenberg, Paul B., Schneider, Lon S., Shade, David M., Weintraub, Daniel, Yesavage, Jerome, Lyketsos, Constantine G.

Journal

JAMA, Volume: 311, No.: 7, Pages.: 682-691

Year of Publication

2014

Abstract

Importance: Agitation is common, persistent, and associated with adverse consequences for patients with Alzheimer disease. Pharmacological treatment options, including antipsychotics are not satisfactory.; Objective: The primary objective was to evaluate the efficacy of citalopram for agitation in patients with Alzheimer disease. Key secondary objectives examined effects of citalopram on function, caregiver distress, safety, cognitive safety, and tolerability.; Design, Setting, and Participants: The Citalopram for Agitation in Alzheimer Disease Study (CitAD) was a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, parallel group trial that enrolled 186 patients with probable Alzheimer disease and clinically significant agitation from 8 academic centers in the United States and Canada from August 2009 to January 2013.; Interventions: Participants (n = 186) were randomized to receive a psychosocial intervention plus either citalopram (n = 94) or placebo (n = 92) for 9 weeks. Dosage began at 10 mg per day with planned titration to 30 mg per day over 3 weeks based on response and tolerability.; Main Outcomes and Measures: Primary outcome measures were based on scores from the 18-point Neurobehavioral Rating Scale agitation subscale (NBRS-A) and the modified Alzheimer Disease Cooperative Study-Clinical Global Impression of Change (mADCS-CGIC). Other outcomes were based on scores from the Cohen-Mansfield Agitation Inventory (CMAI) and the Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI), ability to complete activities of daily living (ADLs), caregiver distress, cognitive safety (based on scores from the 30-point Mini Mental State Examination [MMSE]), and adverse events.; Results: Participants who received citalopram showed significant improvement compared with those who received placebo on both primary outcome measures. The NBRS-A estimated treatment difference at week 9 (citalopram minus placebo) was -0.93 (95% CI, -1.80 to -0.06), P = .04. Results from the mADCS-CGIC showed 40% of citalopram participants having moderate or marked improvement from baseline compared with 26% of placebo recipients, with estimated treatment effect (odds ratio [OR] of being at or better than a given CGIC category) of 2.13 (95% CI, 1.23-3.69), P = .01. Participants who received citalopram showed significant improvement on the CMAI, total NPI, and caregiver distress scores but not on the NPI agitation subscale, ADLs, or in less use of rescue lorazepam. Worsening of cognition (-1.05 points; 95% CI, -1.97 to -0.13; P = .03) and QT interval prolongation (18.1 ms; 95% CI, 6.1-30.1; P = .01) were seen in the citalopram group.; Conclusions and Relevance: Among patients with probable Alzheimer disease and agitation who were receiving psychosocial intervention, the addition of citalopram compared with placebo significantly reduced agitation and caregiver distress; however, cognitive and cardiac adverse effects of citalopram may limit its practical application at the dosage of 30 mg per day.; Trial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00898807.;

Bibtex Citation

@article{Porsteinsson_2014, doi = {10.1001/jama.2014.93}, url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jama.2014.93}, year = 2014, month = {feb}, publisher = {American Medical Association ({AMA})}, volume = {311}, number = {7}, pages = {682}, author = {Anton P. Porsteinsson and Lea T. Drye and Bruce G. Pollock and D. P. Devanand and Constantine Frangakis and Zahinoor Ismail and Christopher Marano and Curtis L. Meinert and Jacobo E. Mintzer and Cynthia A. Munro and Gregory Pelton and Peter V. Rabins and Paul B. Rosenberg and Lon S. Schneider and David M. Shade and Daniel Weintraub and Jerome Yesavage and Constantine G. Lyketsos}, title = {Effect of Citalopram on Agitation in Alzheimer Disease}, journal = {{JAMA}} }

Keywords

activities of daily living, adverse, adverse effects, aged, aged, 80 and over, alzheimer disease, arrhythmias cardiac, caregivers, chemically induced, citalopram, cognition, complications, double-blind method, drug effects, drug therapy, etiology, events, female, humans, male, nursing, physiopathology, psychology, psychomotor agitation, serotonin uptake inhibitors, severity of illness index, stress, psychological, therapeutic use, treatment outcome

Countries of Study

Canada, USA

Types of Dementia

Alzheimer’s Disease

Types of Study

Randomised Controlled Trial

Type of Outcomes

ADLs/IADLs, Behaviour, Carers’ Mental Health, Cognition, Other

Type of Interventions

Pharmaceutical Interventions

Pharmaceutical Interventions

Antipsychotics and antidepressants