This site uses cookies to measure how you use the website so it can be updated and improved based on your needs and also uses cookies to help remember the notifications you’ve seen, like this one, so that we don’t show them to you again. If you could also tell us a little bit about yourself, this information will help us understand how we can support you better and make this site even easier for you to use and navigate.

A randomized pilot clinical trial of the safety of pioglitazone in treatment of patients with Alzheimer disease

Authors

Geldmacher, David S., Fritsch, Thomas, McClendon, McKee J., Landreth, Gary

Journal

Archives Of Neurology, Volume: 68, No.: 1, Pages.: 45-50

Year of Publication

2011

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate the safety of the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma agonist pioglitazone in nondiabetic patients with Alzheimer disease (AD) and to explore treatment effect sizes on clinical outcomes.; Design: Double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized controlled trial of 18-month duration.; Setting: Two academic medical center outpatient clinics.; Patients: Nondiabetic patients meeting research criteria for probable AD were enrolled. Twenty-five of 29 subjects completed the study; no withdrawals were attributable to adverse effects.; Intervention: Subjects received pioglitazone (Actos), titrated to 45 mg daily, or matching placebo, and 200 IU of vitamin E daily. Patients maintained treatment with cholinesterase inhibitors and could begin memantine therapy when it became available during the study.; Main Outcome Measures: The primary outcome was frequency of reported adverse effects (AEs). Secondary outcomes were measures of cognition, activities of daily living, neuropsychiatric symptoms, and global function.; Results: Peripheral edema was the principal AE occurring more frequently in subjects taking pioglitazone than placebo (28.6% vs 0%). This is consistent with the known AE profile of pioglitazone. No group differences in laboratory measures were identified. No significant treatment effect was observed on exploratory analysis of clinical efficacy.; Conclusions: Pioglitazone was generally well tolerated in this pilot study. There were no serious or unanticipated adverse events or clinical laboratory changes attributable to pioglitazone over a long-term exposure in nondiabetic patients with AD. The tolerability of pioglitazone in this population and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma effects in laboratory models of AD support further study of this drug class in earlier disease stages.; Trial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00982202.;

Bibtex Citation

@article{Geldmacher_2011, doi = {10.1001/archneurol.2010.229}, url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/archneurol.2010.229}, year = 2011, month = {jan}, publisher = {American Medical Association ({AMA})}, volume = {68}, number = {1}, author = {David S. Geldmacher and Thomas Fritsch and McKee J. McClendon and Gary Landreth}, title = {A Randomized Pilot Clinical Trial of the Safety of Pioglitazone in Treatment of Patients With Alzheimer Disease}, journal = {Arch Neurol} }

Keywords

adverse, adverse effects, aged, aged, 80 and over, alzheimer disease, blood, blood glucose, chemically induced, double-blind method, drug effects, drug therapy, effects, female, humans, male, medication, metabolism, middle aged, neuropsychological tests, pain, pilot projects, pioglitazone, psychology, therapeutic use, thiazolidinediones, treatment outcome

Countries of Study

USA

Types of Dementia

Alzheimer’s Disease

Types of Study

Randomised Controlled Trial

Type of Outcomes

ADLs/IADLs, Behaviour, Cognition, Other

Settings

Hospital Outpatient Care

Type of Interventions

Pharmaceutical Interventions

Pharmaceutical Interventions

Herbal remedies, vitamins, dietary supplements, Other