This site uses cookies to measure how you use the website so it can be updated and improved based on your needs and also uses cookies to help remember the notifications you’ve seen, like this one, so that we don’t show them to you again. If you could also tell us a little bit about yourself, this information will help us understand how we can support you better and make this site even easier for you to use and navigate.

Development and evaluation of an educational intervention for general practitioners and staff caring for people with dementia living in residential facilities


Beer, Christopher, Lowry, Rachel, Horner, Barbara, Almeida, Osvaldo P., Scherer, Samuel, Lautenschlager, Nicola T., Bretland, Nick, Flett, Penelope, Schaper, Frank, Flicker, Leon


International Psychogeriatrics / IPA, Volume: 23, No.: 2, Pages.: 221-229

Year of Publication



Background: Despite high levels of participation in dementia education, general practitioners (GPs) and residential care facility (RCF) staff report perceived learning needs. Small group education, which is flexible, individualized, practical and case-based, is sought. We aimed to develop educational interventions for GPs and RCF staff tailored to meet their perceived educational needs.; Methods: We used a consultative process to develop education programs. A flexible program for RCF staff was developed in 30-minute blocks, which could be combined in sessions of different lengths. The RCF program aimed to facilitate sustainable change by engaging local “Dementia Champions”. For GPs, face-to-face and self-directed packages were developed. We collected participant feedback to evaluate the program.; Results: GPs and RCF staff were recruited as part of a larger intervention study. Sixteen of the 27 GPs who were offered the dementia education participated. Two of the 16 GPs participated in both learning packages. A total of 45 GP feedback responses were received from 16 GPs: 28 out of 45 GPs (62%) reported that the participants’ learning needs were entirely met. Eighteen of 19 facilities offered the intervention participated and 326 RCF staff attended one or more of the 94 RCF education sessions. Feedback was collected from 93 sessions: 1013 out of 1067 RCF staff feedback responses (95%) reported that the session met the participants’ learning needs. Qualitative feedback was also strongly positive.; Conclusion: Participants perceived the education programs as meeting their needs. Despite explicit attempts to provide flexible delivery options, overall participation rates remained low.;

Bibtex Citation

@article{Beer_2010, doi = {10.1017/s104161021000195x}, url = {}, year = 2010, month = {oct}, publisher = {Cambridge University Press ({CUP})}, volume = {23}, number = {02}, pages = {221--229}, author = {Christopher Beer and Rachel Lowry and Barbara Horner and Osvaldo P. Almeida and Samuel Scherer and Nicola T. Lautenschlager and Nick Bretland and Penelope Flett and Frank Schaper and Leon Flicker}, title = {Development and evaluation of an educational intervention for general practitioners and staff caring for people with dementia living in residential facilities}, journal = {Int. Psychogeriatr.} }


aged, dementia, education, education continuing, general practitioners, humans, manpower, meeting, needs, new zealand, organization administration, program evaluation, residential facilities, therapy, training

Countries of Study


Types of Dementia

Dementia (general / unspecified)

Types of Study

Before and After Study

Type of Outcomes



Long Term Residential Care without medically trained staff, Primary Care

Type of Interventions

Workforce oriented interventions

Workforce Interventions

Professional Training / Continuing Professional Development