This site uses cookies to measure how you use the website so it can be updated and improved based on your needs and also uses cookies to help remember the notifications you’ve seen, like this one, so that we don’t show them to you again. If you could also tell us a little bit about yourself, this information will help us understand how we can support you better and make this site even easier for you to use and navigate.

Additional use of Aβ₄₂/Aβ₄₀ ratio with cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers P-tau and Aβ₄₂ increases the level of evidence of Alzheimer’s disease pathophysiological process in routine practice

Authors

Sauvée, Mathilde, DidierLaurent, Guerric, Latarche, Clotilde, Escanyé, Marie-Christine, Olivier, Jean-Luc, Malaplate-Armand, Catherine

Journal

Journal Of Alzheimer's Disease: JAD, Volume: 41, No.: 2, Pages.: 377-386

Year of Publication

2014

Abstract

Background: Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers have recently been included in the criteria for the diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease (AD). Since interpretation of CSF profile requires the combination of three parameters, biological data are not always conclusive and isolated elevation of phosphorylated tau (P-tau) or reduction of amyloid-β (Aβ)42 alone can be observed. In these cases, Aβ42/Aβ40 ratio could be more relevant than Aβ42 absolute values by considering inter-individual variations in the total amyloid load.; Objective: The objective of this study was to assess the use of Aβ42/Aβ40 ratio to improve the accuracy of biological conclusions in the diagnosis of patients with ambiguous CSF Aβ42 or tau results.; Methods: Among 386 lumbar punctures analyzed in the lab in 2 years, 122 showed ambiguous biological data that were completed by CSF Aβ40 quantification and Aβ42/Aβ40 ratio calculation. A biological conclusion was then made using 0.05 as the Aβ42/Aβ40 ratio cut-off.; Results: Our results showed that one-third of the biological profiles of patients with atypical dementia were ambiguous. The addition of Aβ42/Aβ40 ratio increased the proportion of interpretable biological profiles from 69% to 87%, without changing the conclusion when usual biomarkers (Aβ42 and P-tau) were concordant.; Conclusion: Our results support the use of the Aβ42/Aβ40 ratio in addition to the usual CSF AD biomarkers for patients with ambiguous biological profiles. This method could be specifically directed to this population in order to improve the level of certainty for clinical routine practice.;

Keywords

adult, aged, aged, 80 and over, alzheimer disease, alzheimer’s disease, biological markers, cerebrospinal fluid, dementia, diagnosis, diagnosis, differential, diagnosos, differential diagnosis, female, humans, lewy body disease, male, middle aged, mild cognitive impairment, peptide, peptide fragments, phosphorylation, ptau, ratio, rm40, rm42, rmbeta, spinal puncture, tau proteins, young adult

Countries of Study

France

Types of Dementia

Alzheimer’s Disease

Types of Study

Cohort Study

Type of Outcomes

Other

Type of Interventions

Diagnostic Target Identification

Diagnostic Targets

Biological Testing