This site uses cookies to measure how you use the website so it can be updated and improved based on your needs and also uses cookies to help remember the notifications you’ve seen, like this one, so that we don’t show them to you again. If you could also tell us a little bit about yourself, this information will help us understand how we can support you better and make this site even easier for you to use and navigate.

Validity of the free and cued selective reminding test in predicting dementia: the 3C study


Auriacombe, S., Helmer, C., Amieva, H., Berr, C., Dubois, B., Dartigues, J. F.


Neurology, Volume: 74, No.: 22, Pages.: 1760-1767

Year of Publication



Objective: We assessed the validity of the Free and Cued Selective Reminding Test (FCSRT) in predicting dementia 2 and 5 years after initial evaluation in a population-based cohort over age 65 years participating in the French 3 Cities (3C) study.; Methods: The FCSRT was administered at baseline along with demographics, cognitive and functional scales, and a memory-complaint questionnaire. Two and 5 years later, subjects were assessed for dementia using a 2-stage design. We calculated the sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of various cutoff FCSRT scores in dementia prediction.; Results: Among 1,761 participants at the Bordeaux 3C center, 98 were excluded because of existing dementia, leading to 1,663 candidate participants. Among them, 1,464 underwent FCSRT and other mental status testing. Of these, 1,299 subjects were reassessed at 2 years, and 1,160 were seen 5 years later. At 2 years, 23 subjects had developed dementia; by 5 years, 60 additional subjects showed dementia. With optimized cutoff scores, the subtests of free and total recall from the FCSRT showed good sensitivity and fair specificity for the diagnosis of dementia, and the negative predictive values were high. However, positive predictive values were low: many subjects with low scores for free and total recall on FCSRT remained free of dementia at 5 years.; Conclusions: In a population-based setting, despite good sensitivity, low Free and Cued Selective Reminding Test (FCSRT) scores must be interpreted with caution. Those subjects, who often do not have memory complaints, may have unrecognized poor memory status. High FCSRT scores are useful to rule out dementia.;

Bibtex Citation

@article{Auriacombe_2010, doi = {10.1212/wnl.0b013e3181df0959}, url = {}, year = 2010, month = {apr}, publisher = {Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)}, volume = {74}, number = {22}, pages = {1760--1767}, author = {S. Auriacombe and C. Helmer and H. Amieva and C. Berr and B. Dubois and J.- F. Dartigues}, title = {Validity of the Free and Cued Selective Reminding Test in predicting dementia: The 3C Study}, journal = {Neurology} }


aged, aged, 80 and over, cognition disorders, cohort studies, community health planning, complications, cues, dementia, diagnosis, etiology, female, geriatric assessment, humans, male, neuropsychological tests, physiopathology, predictive value of tests, reproducibility of results, retrospective studies, sensitivity and specificity, time factors

Countries of Study


Types of Dementia

Dementia (general / unspecified)

Types of Study

Cohort Study

Type of Interventions

Diagnostic Target Identification

Diagnostic Targets

Cognition testing (inc. task driven tests such as clock drawing)