This site uses cookies to measure how you use the website so it can be updated and improved based on your needs and also uses cookies to help remember the notifications you’ve seen, like this one, so that we don’t show them to you again. If you could also tell us a little bit about yourself, this information will help us understand how we can support you better and make this site even easier for you to use and navigate.

Are two methods better than one? Evaluating the effectiveness of combining errorless learning with vanishing cues

Authors

Haslam, Catherine, Moss, Zoë, Hodder, Kathryn

Journal

Journal Of Clinical And Experimental Neuropsychology, Volume: 32, No.: 9, Pages.: 973-985

Year of Publication

2010

Abstract

A growing trend in memory rehabilitation is to combine learning principles to enhance treatment effects. While this makes intuitive sense, little is known about the added value of incorporating each method. A further complication is that some interventions, although primarily based on one learning principle, actually incorporate several, which again adds to the difficulty in differentiating the individual contribution of techniques. In this paper we report results of two experiments comparing the effectiveness of combining principles of errorless learning (EL) with vanishing cues (VC) relative to each in isolation. Healthy controls (N = 60), learning under standard and dual-task conditions, and patients with probable Alzheimer’s disease (N = 22) took part in Experiments 1 and 2, respectively. In each experiment, participants were asked to learn greeble- or face-name associations, and memory was tested after interference or brief delay. For healthy controls, EL alone and EL + VC produced the best results, but there was no difference between these conditions. For the Alzheimer’s patients, all treatment conditions (EL, VC, EL + VC) were significantly better than trial and error, and, in this case, we found that the combined method was significantly better than VC in isolation. Importantly, in both experiments there was little support for use of combined over individual learning principles.;

Bibtex Citation

@article{Haslam_2010, doi = {10.1080/13803391003662686}, url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13803391003662686}, year = 2010, month = {nov}, publisher = {Informa {UK} Limited}, volume = {32}, number = {9}, pages = {973--985}, author = {Catherine Haslam and Zoë Moss and Kathryn Hodder}, title = {Are two methods better than one? Evaluating the effectiveness of combining errorless learning with vanishing cues}, journal = {Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology} }

Keywords

affect, aged, alzheimer disease, and, association learning, cognition, cues, diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, errorless, female, humans, intelligence, learning, male, memory, memory disorders, names, neuropsychological tests, photic stimulation, physiology, psychology, psychomotor performance, rehabilition, using, vanishing, young adult

Countries of Study

UK

Types of Dementia

Alzheimer’s Disease

Types of Study

Non randomised controlled trial

Type of Outcomes

Cognition

Type of Interventions

Non-pharmacological Treatment

Non-Pharmaceutical Interventions

Other